We still like the Canon 35mm f/1.4, but at nearly double the price, we recommend the Sigma instead. And you don’t get quite the same build quality as Canon either, although this Sigma lens is pretty well made. What do you sacrifice by going with Sigma? Autofocus can be slightly slower than with a native Canon lens (you may want to calibrate the lens upon receiving it, which isn’t optimal for some people). For those who shoot street photography, the Sigma 35mm f/1.4 Art is our top EF lens choice at this focal length and considerably cheaper than the Canon 35mm f/1.4 ($1,649). And the company has been hitting it out of the park of late with its Art series, which features fast f/1.4 lenses at focal lengths like 35mm, 50mm, and 85mm, among others. Sigma is one of our favorite manufacturers of third-party lenses, offering up unique options that generally are faster and cheaper than Canon’s native offerings. What we like: $800 less than the Canon 35mm f/1.4. For most other people, we prefer to save with the 16-35mm f/4. If you specialize in things like sunsets or event photography at night, the f/2.8 may be worth the extra cost and weight. Given the Canon 16-35mm f/4 is less than half of the price of the 16-35mm f/2.8, considerably smaller and lighter, and comes with image stabilization, we give the nod to the f/4 version. A healthy percentage of people shoot wide-angle photos in daylight, not to mention bokeh is less relevant than with a portrait lens like a 24-70mm. And at around $725, it’s a great value for a pro-level wide-angle zoom.Īt the 16-35mm focal length range, the f/4 vs. With this lens you get great sharpness, reasonable levels of distortion, and a high quality “L” series build that Canon is known for. In this category we like the 16-35mm f/4 best, which isn’t as strong in low light as the uber-expensive f/2.8 III below but comparable on most other fronts. What we like: Lighter and considerably less expensive than the 16-35mm f/2.8 below.įor those who spend a lot of time outdoors, a quality wide-angle zoom can open up a world of possibilities. If not, the Sigma 50mm f/1.4 Art and Canon 50mm f/1.4 are viable alternatives for less. If you frequently shoot portraits and plan on having a 50mm on your camera a good chunk of the time, the cost of this lens is worth it. You can save with various f/1.4 versions and the Canon 50mm f/1.8 below is only $125, but the step down in image and build quality is pretty substantial across the board. The downsides of the Canon 50mm f/1.2 are clear: a very high price tag for a prime lens along with a relatively high weight. If you specialize in people photos and want the best in terms of image quality, this 50mm f/1.2 should not disappoint. With this lens you get superb low light performance, bokeh, depth of field, and sharpness. Expensive, yes, but the Canon 50mm f/1.2 is the premier portrait option for high-end DSLRs including the 5D Mark IV and 5DS R. Sometimes the world is a far better place through an f/1.2 lens. What we don’t: Very pricey for a prime lens. What we like: Incredible depth of field and sharpness. For indoor and nighttime photos, which are common with this type of lens, the upgrade in image quality is well worth the price. We don’t always go this route-see the 16-35mm and 70-200mm below-but this is one of Canon’s premier lenses and the f/2.8 maximum aperture gives you the low light performance, bokeh, and depth of field that you just won’t get from the f/4. In terms of options at this popular focal length range, we heartily recommend the pricier f/2.8 over the f/4 version. And with impressive sharpness and optical performance throughout, many people find that once they put the Canon 24-70mm f/2.8 on their camera, there aren’t a whole of lot situations where it needs to come off. This Canon EF lens pretty much does it all: it’s wide enough for landscape photography yet covers a healthy focal length range for portraits and travel. The 24-70mm f/2.8 is the quintessential all-purpose lens for professionals and enthusiasts who want premium image quality and versatility. What we like: Superb image quality and versatility. For more information, see our Canon EF lens comparison table and lens buying advice below the picks. Canon’s lens offerings are immense-not to mention the third-party models from brands like Sigma and Tokina-but there are plenty of excellent options across the price spectrum. You’ll find a wide range of options on this list including zooms and primes from wide angle and portrait to telephoto. To help you wade through the masses of Canon EF (full frame) lens models, we’ve picked our ten favorites below along with seven that just missed the cut. Buying a Canon full-frame DSLR is a very exciting prospect, but deciding on the right EF-format lenses can be downright challenging.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |